Source: andrew-gumperz.blogspot.com.ar
Opening bids are the foundation on which subsequent bidding is laid. If the foundation is unstable, the rest of the auction may come tumbling down. I often see players lay an unsound foundation holding 4 diamonds and 5 clubs.
Responder
KQxxx
Axxx
xx
xx
Opener
x
Kxx
Axxx
KQTxx
Auction
1
— 1![]()
2
— 2![]()
P
How could this silly contract have been avoided?

Perhaps responder was wrong to correct 2
to 2
. The result would have been better if responder had passed, but how can responder know? Opener would have bid the same if the minors had been reversed. For that matter, when opener bid 2
, he might still hold 17 HCP. Passing then would miss an easy game. No, we can not blame responder for this debacle.
The culprit is a system which asked us to open in our second best suit. A better solution is to open 1
with 5-clubs and 4-diamonds and 11-14 HCP. 1
leaves you well placed over:
- 1
or 1
, you will raise - 1NT, you will takeout to 2

- 2
(inverted raise), you will splinter to 3
However, partner is most likely to respond in our singleton. What happens then?
1
— 1![]()
?
Opener must choose between 1NT or 2
. Yes, either is a distortion, but they are distortions that cost less in the long run than the distortion of opening in your second best suit which frequently gets to the wrong strain. If opener rebids 1NT, a sensible contract is reached routinely.
1
— 1![]()
1NT — 2![]()
Responder
xxxx
Axx
Kxx
xxx
X — ( P ) — ?
X — ( P ) — ?
- With 2-2-4-5 shape, I normally open 1
planning to rebid 1NT when partner bids 1M. - With 3-1-4-5 shape, I normally open 1
planning to rebid:
- 1NT if partner bids my singleton
- 2M if partner bids my 3-card suit major
- 2
if partner responds 1NT
Don’t forget to follow us @





















