Source: 14th European Junior /1st European Schools Bridge Teams Championships This article was written in 1994:  The hand below was played in Round 3 by that well-known ‘grandfather,’ Alfredo Versace. I was disappointed that he played 6 in a very simple way instead of finding the ‘brilliant’ solution described here. First, though, I want to point out that he reached this bad slam at least partly because he and his partner had rejected a convention I would like to share with you. Misfit hands, as we all know, can often be dangerous hands, especially nowadays when some players feel they have to make a lot of bids before partner will realise that they have a ‘good’ hand. Consider what responder has shown in the ordinary auction: 1 – 2, 2 – 3. Is he 5-4 with a strong hand that doesn’t know yet where it is going? Is he trying to reach 3NT if opener has a little something in clubs? Does he have a real minor 2-suiter and slam interest? Who knows? I believe that it is worthwhile to invest some ‘system space’ in explicitly solving at least part of responder’s ‘2-suit’ problems. This scheme works well when the 1 and 1 opening shows at least five, and I suspect that it is also good if the major can be a 4-card suit. Over 1 or 1 a jump to 3 or 3 shows a game-forcing hand with either two 5-card suits (not opener’s suit) or a (semi-) solid 1-suiter. Opener’s cheapest rebid is an artificial relay while other rebids are basically natural but will depend on the rest of your system. For example: 1 3 3Relay, to which responses are: 3 + 5  (the relay suit). 3 + 4 . 3NT1-suiter, 12-14 points. 41-suiter, 15+, cuebid. 41-suiter, 15+, no club control. 3(Semi-) solid heart suit. 3 + 6 (or 5-5+ if you play canapé) 3NT Natural, minimum, no slam interest. Higher Real club fit. For other suit combinations the bidding is similar. We look at the hand now: Dealer: North. None Vul
 9 5 2 Q 9 8 6 3 9 2 K Q J K 2 A Q J 7 3 A 9 6 4 3 2 A 10 7 4 3 A K J 10 7 4 8 4 Q J 8 6 5 K 10 6 5 10 8 7 5