Note: An interview of Mr. Michael Cappelletti was published in the Daily Bulletin, Tuesday, March 13, 2007, Volume 50, Number 5, of the 50th Spring North American Bridge Championships held in St. Louis, Missouri United States. The essence of the interview were his personal views on the concept behind this conventional method.
Added to this confusion is also the designation Pottage for the same concept, ascribed to Mr. John F. Pottage of London, England, under which designation the conventional method is known. The origin of this concept is also claimed by Mr. Gerald W. Helms of Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, but is not designated as such.
Therefore, when a bridge player refers to Cappelletti, Hamilton, or Pottage, then the bridge player refers to the identical defense method employed against an opening of No Trump by the opponents.
The concept is employed as a defense method following an opening of No Trump by the opponents in either the direct seat or in the balancing seat. The overcall promises either a one-suited holding or a two-suited holding with values not exceeding 15 points. Importance must be given to the state of vulnerability and the location of the values, which should be in the suit or suits promised or indicated.
Although it is a matter of partnership agreement, the one-suited holding should contain at least a 6-card plus suit, and for a two-suited holding the distribution should be at least 5-5. Some advocates have reduced the distribution to 5-4 if the values are located only in the two suits such as: KQJ10 and AQ1087. Some very aggressive players will even decide to overcall with a 4-4 distribution, but only in the Major suits. This is purely a matter of partnership understanding.
After a No Trump opening, the bids of the overcaller (also referred to as the intervenor – partner is called the advancer) are as follows:
Opponent | Intervenor | Meaning |
1NT | The range of the No Trump should be announced. | |
2 | Shows any one-suited holding. | |
2 | Shows Hearts and Spades, both Major suits. | |
2 | Shows Hearts and an unspecified Minor suit. | |
2 | Shows Spades and an unspecified Minor suit. | |
2NT | Shows both Minor suits. | |
Double | If the intervenor has not previously passed, then any double is for penalty. Partner must pass. |
Each overcall generally promises fewer than 15 high card points. All overcalls at the three level are natural.
Advancer and Continuances
The advancer has several options, not forgetting that the 1NT bidder generally sits to his left with a defined strength and distribution.
Responses after Intervenor has overcalled with 2 showing a one-suited holding:
Pass: | with at least 6-card support in Clubs. |
2 : | Relay bid, allowing his partner to pass or bid his suit. If the suit is Diamonds, then the intervenor passes. However, if the intervenor holds a 6-card Club suit and a 4-card Diamond suit, then the intervenor rebids 2 No Trump. An example would be: |
Intervenor | ||||||||
|
||||||||
2NT |
2: | This bid shows a 5-card Heart suit and also weak values. |
2: | This bid shows a 5-card Spade suit and also weak values. |
2 NT: | Promises 11 plus High Card Points and support for all four suits. Partner is invited to bid game with a maximum. |
Responses after Intervenor has overcalled with 2 showing both Major suits:
Pass: | with at least 6-card support in Diamonds. |
2: | Cheapest Relay bid, choice of suit, unconstructive. Shows preference. |
2: | Choice of suit, unconstructive. Shows preference. |
2NT: | Shows length in both Minor suits and is an asking bid for the better Minor suit of the intervenor. |
3: | This bid shows a 6-card length in Clubs |
3: | Invitational, promising 4 or more Trump. This jump may also be regarded as preemptive in nature. Partnership agreement. |
3: | Invitational, promising 4 or more Trump. This jump may also be regarded as preemptive in nature. Partnership agreement. |
Pass: | Shows a fit for the known Major suit and between 0-7 points. |
Single Raise: | Shows a fit for the known Major suit and about 8-9 points. |
2 NT: | This is a relay bid by the advancer asking the intervenor to bid his unspecified Minor suit. However, if the advancer raises the Major suit of the intervenor on the second round of bidding, then the advancer shows a good fit for the known Major suit and around 10-12 points. This is then invitational. |
3: | Shows a weak holding. This is a preference for Clubs and also a sign off. No game interest. |
3: | Shows a weak holding. This is a preference for Diamonds and also a sign off. No game interest. |
3: | Advancer promises a one-suited holding in Hearts (generally a 6-card plus suit) and shortness in both Minor suits. |
3: | Advancer promises a one-suited holding in Spades (generally a 6-card plus suit) and shortness in both Minor suits. |
4: | A jump in Clubs promises a distributional holding, good support, and invites game if the intervenor has maximum values. |
4: | A jump in Diamonds promises a distributional holding, good support, and invites game if the intervenor has maximum values. |
1. | If the intervenor has a two-suited holding in Diamonds and Hearts, then the intervenor bids 2 Diamonds after the 2 Clubs relay. The 2 Diamonds rebid promises good support in both red suits. The advancer must then determine whether the contract should be in Diamonds or Hearts. With better Diamonds the advancer should pass since game in a Minor suit is not an option opposite a 1 No Trump opening by the opponents. With better Hearts the advancer will correct to Hearts and the intervenor will most likely pass since the intervenor has previously passed. |
2. | If the intervenor rebids 2 Hearts after the 2 Clubs relay, then the intervenor promises Hearts and Clubs as a two-suited holding, whereby the Heart suit is generally the stronger, normally longer suit. The advancer either passes or corrects to Clubs since the Minor suit is always the Club suit. |
3. | If the intervenor rebids 2 Spades after the 2 Clubs relay, then the intervenor promises Spades and Clubs as a two-suited holding, whereby the Spade suit is generally the stronger, normally longer suit. The advancer either passes or corrects to Clubs since the Minor suit is always the Club suit. |
In the case that the auction proceeds as follows: 1 No Trump – 2 Clubs – Double, a Redouble shows 7 or more high card points and support in all suits, and invites his partner to compete on the three level.
As already mentioned, the Cappelletti conventional method can be used as either a direct overcall or in the pass-out seat. The conventional method can also be used after the opponents have opened a 2NT or even a 3NT. The conventional method can also be used over Gambling 3NT. The conventional method can also be used if your partner has opened the auction and an opponent overcalls with 1NT.
As with all conventional methods there are some flaws to the concept. For example if the intervenor doubles and the advancer holds a long suit, he may not preempt to show this suit. The advancer is first obligated to bid 2 Clubs and later indicate the long suit and shortage in all other suits.
When this auction happens, the intervenor must base his rebids logically upon the insistence of the advancer for this one long suit. Since the advancer is not bidding according to the guidelines set forth in the established responses, then the intervenor must infer that advancer has a preemptive-style suit, which he has been unable to bid.
Mr. Jerry Helms arrived at a solution to solve this problem in the bidding sequences with the decision to reverse the meaning of an immediate bid of a Major suit and the meaning of the artificial 2 Clubs, as shown below:
2: | An artificial bid showing a two-suiter and one unspecified Minor suit. The advancer bids 2 asking for the Major suit. If the advancer does not have support for the suit of the intervenor but good support for either Minor suit, the advancer rebids 2 No Trump. |
2: | This bid is natural and shows at least a 6-card plus Heart suit. |
2: | This bid is natural and shows at least a 6-card plus Spade suit. |