Ilai BANIRI
Ilai Baniri

Discussing some hands of this event with my friend Ilai Baniri (ISR), we decided to consult some hands with friends. I for my side and he for his, combining experience with youth, and the results are as follows.

All the info about the event click here

Problem 3; Brazil against France Category U26

Dealer North. N/S Vul

J 10 K Q  A K x x x x x  K x

West North East South
1NT1 Pass 22
Pass 33 Pass 3
Pass 34 Pass ?

1: 11-13 Bal.

2: Any game force.

3: 4-4 in the majors

4: Strength in spade.

Roberto Figueira de Mello(BRZ) WGM: 4

Roberto Figueira de Mello
Roberto Figueira de Mello

4– A slam is likely to make in 6or 6NT.

Marcelo Castello Branco (BRZ) WGM: 4  

Marcelo Castello Branco
Marcelo Castello Branco

Assuming 3 shows something in diamonds (not xx), i’ll try 4. 6is cold if N has something like:
AKxx
xxxx
Qxx
Ax

And very good even with three small diamonds                        

David Bakhshi (ENG) WIM: 4

David Bakhshi
David Bakhshi

Slam is still possible if partner has something like A K and A. I would like to bid 4to show my club control and slam interest but A K concerned that might be natural, so will bid 4and see whether partner can cue a major. If she bids 4.I can bid 5and if she bids 4then I’ll try RKCB.

Krzysztof Martens (MON) WGM: 3NT

Krzyztof Martens
Krzyztof Martens

3NT – what else?

Brian Senior (ENG) WM: 4

Brian Senior
Brian Senior
4. The implication of 3is that he has weak hearts. 3NT may only make if diamonds run, while if they do run 5will usually be OK also and it will often be safer when diamonds do no run. Harmless to try 4on the way to 5in case he has 4-4-3-2 with A K and A, for example, when slam will be good.

Dennis Bilde (DEN) WIM: 4 

Dennis Bilde

I would bid 4. I think p should have some sort of interest in
diamonds, since he didnt bid 3N over 3. 5should be pretty safe and we
make 6 on many hands.

Mikael Rimstedt (SWE) WIM: 4
Mikael Rimstedt 
Mikael Rimstedt
Bidding 4and will then let partner decide where we belong after some cue-bids/last train + Sign off.
 Liam Milne (AUS) WIM: 3NT
Liam Milne
Liam Milne 
3NT. Partner is likely 4423, and even if they have good strength e.g. AKxx Jxxx xx Axx we still need trumps to break. I think I have shown interest in playing in diamonds, so if partner has 4432 they may bid 4and we can cue-bid on the way to 5or 6.
Christian Bakke (NOR) WM: 4
Christian Bakke
4 – A cue on the way to 5, to give pd a chance to raise with max.
Bar Tarnovski (ISR) WIM: 3NT
Bar TARNOVSKI
Bar TARNOVSKI 
I need a bit information about their system . they might have agreement of bidding strength with Diamond fit – that would change my thought).
In case that 3is just showing strength I would bid 3NT . if 3is a fit Diamond + strength then there is reason for bidding 4cue bid looking for slam in diamond or
just play in diamonds.
Asaf Yekutieli (ISR) 3NT
Asaf YEKUTIELI
BBO Nick: tol23
Slam being cold requires an excellent hand from partner, along the lines of Axxx xxxx Qx AQx. However, this hand-type is not what I would expect from partner. Most notably, A is not partner’s most likely spade holding, and 3 clubs are not suggested.
The other scenario in which slam may make is partner holding both black aces, with some useful heart holding, and opponents erring on lead. Once again, the assumption that partner holds A seems ill-advised to me.
Finally, with 3 aces and 3 diamonds, partner would commit a grievous error by letting us play 3N. A grand may conceivably be reached all the same.
Finally, I believe 3N is far superior to 5, and 4N is quite dangerous.
Conclusion: 3NT.
Adam Stokka (SWE) 3NT
Adam STOKKA
Adam STOKKA
3NT. I dont know really, i dont like the system.. but i bid 3nt then. Not happy.

Jeff Rubens (USA) 4

Jeff Rubens
Jeff Rubens

Vassilis Virvidakis (GRE) 4

Vasileios Virvidakis
BBO Nick: vasmar

If 4is control asking (in Diamonds) i go for it since you can play either 6, or 4NT. If not I believe 4is better as a cue and if pd is interested and cooperates with a cue you can use RKCB, if he is not he can signoff in 4NT.

Answers:

4 = 5 experts

4 = 4 experts

3NT = 5 expert